|
The following article, written by Neil Bar-Or,
was published in the Ha'aretz
on Wednesday, June 18, 2003.
Conservative
and Reform leaders throw down the gauntlet to Lupolianski
By Neil
Bar-Or
Already shell-shocked
by Uri Lupolianski's snubbing
of international leaders of the Reform movement at
a gathering organized by the local Hebrew Union
College board of governors, Conservative and
Reform Movement leaders are planning to challenge
the new mayor to make good on his promise to be
everyone's mayor now that the election is over.
Anat Hoffman, Director of the
Israel Religious Action Center
(IRAC) - the Reform movement's
political and legal arm - told
Anglo File this week that
Lupolianski "claims to have no
problem with meeting us in
principle, but so far the
evidence is to the contrary."
When asked directly whether or
not Lupolianski would meet with Conservative
and Reform leaders, a spokesman for the
Jerusalem mayor would say only that "decisions
on such meetings will be made only after the
coalition building process is completed," but
added that "the mayor of Jerusalem is the mayor
of all its residents and will not exclude any
movement or organization in the city."
Hoffman said she planned to test that
pledge.
"We're going to invite him to our Sukkah, we're
going to invite him to greet - as other mayors
have - a new batch of rabbinical students when
they arrive in the city. We will send him
invitations well in advance of many events and
we will ask him to commit to at least one."
Hoffman said the election of Jerusalem's
first
Haredi mayor provided a unique opportunity to
bridge the gap between Orthodox and
non-Orthodox Jews. "On one hand, Lupolianski
has a chance to prove that what we as Jews have
in common is greater than our differences; that
regardless of technicalities, those who
identify themselves as Jews can feel welcome in
Jerusalem. On the other hand, this could turn
out to be final proof that the Orthodox
politicians serve one part of the people and
one part only."
Rabbi Levi Weiman-Kelman of the Reform
synagogue
Kol HaNeshama is worried that tough times in
Jerusalem for non-Orthodox Jewish groups are
about to get a lot tougher. His organization
already has to soft-pedal its affiliation with
the Reform movement to get results.
Weiman-Kelman presumes that working with the
municipality now will become even tougher.
"We always have to downplay the
Reform aspect of
anything we do. Any changes that we've been
able to get [approved by the municipality] in
terms of expanding our campus have been on the
basis of it not being for the purposes of a
Reform synagogue, but that it be for `youth
activities' or the like."
Rabbi
Professor David Golinkin, President of the Conservative
Schechter Institute for Jewish Studies said he saw Lupolianski
as a tolerant man with a reputation of helping all citizens
of Israel through his organization, Yad Sarah, that loans
medical supplies to Israelis regardless of religious or
ethnic affiliation. But Golinkin warned Lupolianski to deal
with issues such as Shabbat through dialogue rather than
legislation.
"If
the new mayor is smart, he will not try to legislate such
things or ram them down people's throats, but rather speak
to people like Nir Barkat and other secular parties and
arrive at a consensus. The Haredi world will be making a
big mistake if due to their new political power, they try
and pass stricter laws regarding Shabbat or forbid things
that used to be permitted."
IRAC Director of Public Affairs Gilad
Kariv, was
not so worried about losing freedom of religion
in Jerusalem. "They won't wave the Shabbat
flag, at least not immediately. Lupolianski is
not stupid. He knows Jerusalem is poor and if
he closes down the stores and cinemas that are
open on Shabbat they'll collapse, leaving the
municipality less money to fund Orthodox
schools and yeshivas."
In the wake of continuing budget cuts
from state
coffers, Kariv sees the new ultra-Orthodox-led
city council prioritizing recouping as much of
those lost funds as possible through the
municipality.
Kariv said he believes the bigger problem
lies
in Jerusalem's connection with world Jewry.
"Our five congregations in Jerusalem will be
fine. The non-Orthodox public here needs us -
for bar mitzvahs, for holidays and for batei
midrash. But we as a movement want to see
Jerusalem function as the heart of the Jewish
people."
"In order to bring Reform tourists
to Israel, we
need to make them feel comfortable in
Jerusalem. When a Reform family comes to
Israel, they come for the Western Wall, and
they come for Yad Vashem, and they come to see
Rabin's grave. They may want to stay on Tel
Aviv's seashore, but they're coming [to Israel]
for Jerusalem."
In response to questions about Lupolianski's
plans for maintaining a connection with
international Jewry, the mayor's spokesman said
again, "once the coalition is finalized, the
mayor will be able to sit and address such
concerns."
Rabbi
Golinkin agreed that Lupolianski's
election has implications that reach far beyond the city
limits, "Being the mayor of Jerusalem is a high-profile
job, you meet with a lot of foreign dignitaries, you meet
with a lot of tourists that come to Israel, UJA groups for
instance, are always being greeted by the
mayor. So potentially the mayor can have a huge influence
on the image of Jerusalem and on the image of Israel."
Though their relationships with the
new mayor's
office is the critical question on the minds of
Conservative and Reform leaders, there were
some aspects of Lupolianski's election that
leave them hopeful.
Rabbi Weiman-Kelman said he was "slightly
more
optimistic on a political level in the sense
that the Haredi world has always been a little
bit more practical and accommodating in a way
that Ehud Olmert as a Likudnik never could
be."
Rabbi
Golinkin also noted that "as Jerusalem is a city sacred
to three religions, it would seem that a religious mayor
would be very sensitive
to the needs of the three religions, not just Jewish needs
but Christian and Muslim needs as well."
"In
theory he might be more sensitive than previous mayors have
been, being religious himself. Of course, only time will
tell whether that is the case."
Most of the Conservative and Reform
leaders
agreed that Lupolianski has the potential and
possibly even the intention to be just such a
uniter not only among the three major religions
in Jerusalem but among Jews themselves. But the
question remains whether he has the strength to
challenge other Haredi leaders.
Hoffman wondered "whether what
we have here is a
good guy who put himself in an untenable
position."
"Uri Lupolianski is a man who avoids
conflict,
but if he is to serve the needs of all
Jerusalemites he will have to challenge both
[leading Haredi] Rabbi Eliashiv and his own
number two, Yehoshua Pollack. My belief is that
he will not, and the interests of Jerusalem
will suffer."
Alice
Shalvi, Chair of the Schechter Institute's Executive Committee
concurred. While lamenting
the dissolution of the former Jerusalem Mayor Teddy Kollek's
vision of Jerusalem as a true international city, Shalvi
said that while she
was encouraged by Lupolianski's initial
tendency to maintain the status quo, "the real question
is whether the religious on the city council will override
him."
Kariv stressed that if it turned out
that
Lupolianski indeed "alienates liberal Judaism,
you'll see more and more Jews in the U.S.
support us and give us funds to fight
Lupolianski, but they will not come here, they
will not shop on Ben Yehuda Street, and they
will not stay in our hotels."
 |